A period in the Dutch Republic, peaking in the winter of 1636 to 1637, during which contract prices for tulip bulbs, especially rare virus-streaked broken varieties, rose to extraordinary levels before collapsing in February 1637. Traditionally presented as history's first recorded speculative bubble and a byword for irrational market mania, it sits inside the Dutch Golden Age, the same decades of commercial wealth, colonial trade and civic pride that produced the Dutch Republic's rise as a maritime and financial power. The scale of the traditional account is itself a live dispute among economic historians: Peter Garber and others working from surviving notarial and contract records argue the episode was a much smaller, largely futures-market phenomenon among specialist growers and traders rather than an economy-wide mania, a revisionist reading that has not displaced the traditional account in general reference works.
The traditional irrational-mania account is the one repeated in most general reference works; the Garber revisionist reading, based on surviving notarial and contract records, holds the episode was far narrower in scope. Both readings are live in the secondary literature.
Facts
Connections
Associated With
The episode unfolded entirely within the Dutch Republic's own commercial cities during the Dutch Golden Age.
Source Tulip Mania (Encyclopaedia Britannica)
In Era
Source Tulip Mania (Encyclopaedia Britannica)
In the Other Atlases
Sources
1. Tulip Mania (Encyclopaedia Britannica)
- entry: Tulip Mania
Tulip Mania: Event Type
Traditionally presented as history's first recorded speculative bubble and a byword for irrational market mania, it sits inside the Dutch Golden Age, the same decades of commercial wealth, colonial trade and civic pride that produced the Dutch Republic's rise as a maritime and financial power.
- In Category: Events
- In Era: The Early Modern Period
- Associated With: The Dutch Republic
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.