History Atlas

How The Past Is Known
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Historical Document

Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement

Modern International Agreements and Pacts

The Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement, known as the KBRA, is an American multi-party legal agreement determining river usage and water rights involving the Klamath River and Klamath Basin in the states of California and Oregon. Discussion of the agreement began in 2005, and parties included the states of California and Oregon, the Karuk, Klamath and Yurok tribes, several California and Oregon counties, dozens of private individuals, companies and irrigation districts, and conservation groups including California Trout and Trout Unlimited. Congress failed to pass legislation implementing the KBRA by its January 1, 2016 deadline, but a successor agreement, the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement, was signed later that year. The four dams covered by that settlement were removed by 2024, and salmon returned to Oregon's stretch of the Klamath Basin for the first time in more than a century.

Facts
Document Type
Document Type (category)
Agreement 1
Creation Year
2010 1
Connections

In Era

Source Wikipedia: Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement
In the Other Atlases

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Wikipedia: Klamath Basin Restoration AgreementLead
Quote, Lead
The final document was signed on February 18, 2010, in Salem, Oregon
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement
  • lead paragraph
    The Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement (KBRA) is an American multi-party legal agreement determining river usage and water rights involving the Klama
  • Lead
    The final document was signed on February 18, 2010
  • In Era: The Contemporary Period, lead paragraph and infobox, date
    The Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement (KBRA) is an American multi-party legal agreement determining river usage and water rights involving the Klama
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.