History Atlas

How The Past Is Known
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Historical Document

Vindolanda Tablets

Ancient Inscriptions and Epigraphic Records

The Vindolanda tablets are a collection of postcard sized wooden leaf tablets recovered from the Roman fort of Vindolanda in northern England, inscribed in carbon based ink and dating mostly to the late first and early second centuries AD, around the time Hadrian's Wall was built nearby. Archaeologist Robin Birley discovered the first tablets in 1973, the earliest such ink on wood writing ever recovered from Roman Britain, and excavation has since produced more than 1,700 examples. The tablets mix official military paperwork with private letters exchanged among the soldiers, their commanders, and their families, including an invitation to a birthday party held around the year 100 that is thought to be the oldest surviving document written in Latin by a woman. Most of the collection is now held in Room 49 of the British Museum in London.

Facts
Document Type
Document Type (category)
Archive or Corpus 1
Classification
Medium or Support
Stone or Inscription 1
Connections

In Era

Source Wikipedia: Vindolanda Tablets
In the Other Atlases

Used In

Also in Language Atlas: which uses this subject.

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Wikidata: Vindolanda Tablets
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Vindolanda Tablets
  • Vindolanda Tablets: Medium
    The Vindolanda tablets are a collection of postcard sized wooden leaf tablets recovered from the Roman fort of Vindolanda in northern England, inscribed in carbon based ink and dating mostly to the late first and early second centuries AD, around the time Hadrian's Wall was built nearby.
  • Lead
    are some of the oldest surviving handwritten documents in Britain
View the Source
Wikidata: Vindolanda Tablets
Wikidata Q1153229, class allow-list match (w-wdresolver-0926)View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.