History Atlas

How The Past Is Known
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Historical Document

Banana Framework Agreement

Modern International Agreements and Pacts

The Banana Framework Agreement, concluded in 1993, was an agreement between the European Union and four Latin American banana exporting countries, Costa Rica, Colombia, Nicaragua and Venezuela, setting out shares of a tariff quota for banana exports to the European Union. It resolved part of the long running Banana Wars trade dispute, which began when Latin American exporting countries complained that the European Union's banana import regime violated core GATT trading rules and a GATT dispute panel failed to produce an agreed resolution. The framework agreement gave the four signing countries specific quota shares in place of continued litigation. A further agreement in 2010, the Geneva Agreement on Trade in Bananas, extended participation to more countries and phased down tariffs through 2017, settling the remaining disputes. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Document Type
Document Type (category)
Agreement 1
Creation Year
1993 1
Connections

In Era

Source Wikipedia: Banana Framework Agreement
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Banana Framework Agreement
  • Lead section
    The Banana Framework Agreement (BFA) outlines regulations on the treatment, sharing, and production of bananas and other various banana related activities.
  • intro
    It was concluded in 1993
  • lead paragraph
    The Banana Framework Agreement (BFA) outlines regulations on the treatment, sharing, and production of bananas and other various banana related activi
  • In Era: The Contemporary Period, lead paragraph and infobox, date
    The Banana Framework Agreement (BFA) outlines regulations on the treatment, sharing, and production of bananas and other various banana related activi
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.