The Diet of Worms of 1521 was an imperial diet, a formal deliberative assembly, of the Holy Roman Empire called by Emperor Charles V and conducted in the Imperial Free City of Worms. Martin Luther was summoned to the diet to renounce or reaffirm his views in response to a papal bull of Pope Leo X. In answer to questioning, Luther defended the views that had been criticized and refused to recant them.
Facts
LocationWorms, Holy Roman Empire 1 Classification
Event TypeCultural or Religious Event 1 Connections
In Era
Source Wikipedia: Diet of Worms
Participant
Luther appeared before the Diet as the accused, questioned over his writings, not as a participant among equals.
Source Wikipedia: Diet of Worms
In the Other Atlases
Took Place In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject took place.
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Diet of Worms
WikipediaIntroduction
In answer to questioning, he defended the views that had been criticized and refused to recant them.
Infobox
The diet was conducted from 28 January to 25 May 1521 at the Bischofshof palace in Worms, with the Emperor presiding.
Diet of Worms: Event Type
Martin Luther was summoned to the diet in order to renounce or reaffirm his views in response to a Papal bull of Pope Leo X.
Participant: Martin Luther, Article body
In answer to questioning, he defended the views that had been criticized and refused to recant them.
In Era: The Early Modern Period, lead paragraph and infobox, dates
The Diet of Worms of 1521 (German: Reichstag zu Worms [ˈʁaɪçstaːk tsuː ˈvɔʁms]) was an imperial diet (a formal deliberative assembly) of the Holy Roman Empire called by Emperor Charles V and conducted in the Imperial Free City of Worms.
In Group: Events of Exploration and Reformation, 1454 to 1599, Lead
The Diet of Worms of 1521 (German: Reichstag zu Worms [ˈʁaɪçstaːk tsuː ˈvɔʁms]) was an imperial diet (a formal deliberative assembly) of the Holy Roman Empire called by Emperor Charles V and conducted in the Imperial Free City of Worms.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.