Laozi is the semi-legendary Chinese philosopher traditionally credited as the author of the Tao Te Ching, one of the foundational texts of Taoism, and considered by tradition to have lived in the 6th century BCE during China's Spring and Autumn period. Traditional accounts describe him as a royal archivist for the Zhou court who is said to have met Confucius before withdrawing westward into obscurity, composing his classic text along the way. Modern scholarship regards much of his biography as later invention and the Tao Te Ching itself as likely a composite work by several hands, but the figure of Laozi remains foundational to Chinese religious and philosophical tradition.
Facts
Role
Role (category) Role (category) RoleAncient Chinese philosopher traditionally credited as the author or originating teacher of the Tao Te Ching and regarded as a founder of Taoism 1 Connections
In Era
Source Laozi (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Sources
1. Laozi (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia Foundationlead paragraph, first sentence, describing Laozi as author and teacher of the Tao Te Ching
is the name traditionally given to an ancient Chinese philosopher, also identified as Li Er or Lao Dan, who is regarded as the author or originating teacher associated with the Tao Te Ching (Pinyin: Dào Dé Jīng), one of the foundational texts of Taoism
lead paragraph, first sentence, alternate names clause
also identified as Li Er or Lao Dan
lead paragraph, first sentence, second alternate name
also identified as Li Er or Lao Dan
Laozi: Gender
Traditional accounts describe him as a royal archivist for the Zhou court who is said to have met Confucius before withdrawing westward into obscurity, composing his classic text along the way.
In Era: Classical Antiquity, lead paragraph, lifespan
Infobox: born abbr|trad.|traditionally 6th century BC, sometimes dated 4th century BC; died trad. 5th century BC
View the Source Wikidata: Laozi
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.