History Atlas

How The Past Is Known

History Atlas

Disputed Statements

Claims this atlas currently marks as unsettled or as tested and found false. A debated fact is one scholars hold competing positions on; a debunked one has been checked against the record and found not to hold. Both are kept in view rather than quietly smoothed over, with the reasoning that put each one where it stands.

145 statements.

The Paleolithic Period, End Year-9700

The Paleolithic Period, Eras

Standing

Concerns End Year

Currently States -9700

Conventionally closed with the end of the Pleistocene epoch, about 11,650 years before present; the boundary is geological rather than cultural and its calendar date depends on the dating convention used.

Source Wikipedia

The Post-Classical and Medieval Period, Start Year476

The Post-Classical and Medieval Period, Eras

Standing

Concerns Start Year

Currently States 476

476 CE, the conventional end of the Western Roman Empire, is the most common starting point, but some historians prefer 500 CE as a round marker, and the transition itself is regional and gradual rather than a single dated boundary.

Source The Cambridge Medieval History

The Post-Classical and Medieval Period, End Year1453

The Post-Classical and Medieval Period, Eras

Standing

Concerns End Year

Currently States 1453

1453, the Ottoman conquest of Constantinople, is the traditional endpoint, but some historians prefer 1492, Columbus's first Atlantic voyage, or 1500 as a round marker for the beginning of the early modern period. There is no single agreed transition.

Source The Cambridge Medieval History

The Printing Revolution, Year1440

The Printing Revolution, Events

Standing

Concerns Year

Currently States 1440

Gutenberg's exact date of invention is not precisely documented. Historians generally place it between 1440 and 1450, with his printed Bible, completed around 1455, as the first securely dated major product of the press.

Source Encyclopaedia Britannica

The Punic Wars, Death Toll, Low Estimate150000.000000

The Punic Wars, Events

Standing

Concerns Death Toll, Low Estimate

Currently States 150000.000000

Refers specifically to the Third Punic War's final siege and destruction of Carthage (146 BCE), not the three Punic Wars combined. Ancient sources (via Appian) put Carthage's population at the siege's start anywhere from roughly 200,000 to 700,000, with about 50,000 survivors enslaved after the city fell; modern historians regard the ancient figures as likely inflated and treat any resulting death-toll estimate as an order of magnitude, not a count.

Source The Cambridge Ancient History

The Reformation, End Year1648

The Reformation, Eras

Standing

Concerns End Year

Currently States 1648

The Peace of Westphalia in 1648, ending the Thirty Years' War, is the most commonly cited close; other historians end the period earlier, with the Peace of Augsburg in 1555.

Source Wikipedia

The Renaissance, Start Year1350

The Renaissance, Eras

Standing

Concerns Start Year

Currently States 1350

Conventionally traced to Petrarch and fourteenth-century Italian humanism; other historians place the meaningful start later, in the fifteenth century.

Source Renaissance (Britannica)

The Renaissance, End Year1600

The Renaissance, Eras

Standing

Concerns End Year

Currently States 1600

Conventionally closed around 1600 as the Northern Renaissance gives way to the Baroque and the Scientific Revolution; some historians extend it into the early seventeenth century.

Source Renaissance (Britannica)

The Roman Republic, End Year-27

The Roman Republic, Polities

Standing

Concerns End Year

Currently States -27

The exact end of the Republic is debated. Some historians prefer 44 BCE, the assassination of Julius Caesar, or 31 BCE, Octavian's victory at Actium, over 27 BCE, when Octavian took the title Augustus and the Senate formally restored constitutional government under his controlling influence.

Source The Cambridge Ancient History

The Scientific Revolution, Start Year1543

The Scientific Revolution, Eras

Standing

Concerns Start Year

Currently States 1543

1543 (Copernicus De revolutionibus) is the conventional opening date and the one this atlas carries, but historiography is genuinely divided into named traditions: Herbert Butterfield (Origins of Modern Science, 1949) helped fix the sharp-break narrative starting here; Pierre Duhems continuity thesis argues medieval Scholastic natural philosophy already contained the revolutions seeds, denying any clean start; Steven Shapin (The Scientific Revolution, 1996) opens by disputing that a single coherent, datable Revolution occurred at all, treating 1543 as a useful convention rather than a real threshold.

Source Scientific Revolution (Encyclopaedia Britannica), Encyclopaedia Britannica Editors

The Scientific Revolution, End Year1687

The Scientific Revolution, Eras

Standing

Concerns End Year

Currently States 1687

1687 (Newtons Principia) is the conventional close and the one this atlas carries, but some historians extend the period into the early Enlightenment (through the 1700s-1720s) to include the Principias reception and Newtonianisms spread across Europe, while others hold the synthesis essentially complete at publication.

Source Scientific Revolution (Encyclopaedia Britannica), Encyclopaedia Britannica Editors

The Viking Age, Start Year793

The Viking Age, Eras

Standing

Concerns Start Year

Currently States 793

Conventionally dated from the 793 raid on the monastery at Lindisfarne, though modern scholarship increasingly treats Scandinavian expansion as a longer, gradual process without one sharp start date.

The Warring States Period, Start Year-475

The Warring States Period, Eras

Standing

Concerns Start Year

Currently States -475

The starting point of the Warring States period is a periodization convention rather than a single agreed event. Historians have used at least three anchors: 481 BCE, where the Spring and Autumn Annals traditionally end; 475 BCE, Sima Qian's choice and the most often cited, which the atlas follows; and 403 BCE, when the Zhou royal court formally recognized the partition of the state of Jin among the Han, Zhao and Wei lineages, the convention Sima Guang used centuries later in the Zizhi Tongjian. Some sources instead mark 453 BCE, the year of Jin's effective (if not yet formally recognized) partition.

Source Wikipedia: Warring States Period

Thirty Years War, Death Toll, Low Estimate4500000.000000

Thirty Years War, Events

Standing

Concerns Death Toll, Low Estimate

Currently States 4500000.000000

The lower end of the range general histories cite for total deaths across the war zone from combat, disease and famine combined; a count of direct military dead alone would be substantially smaller.

Source Europe's Tragedy: A History of the Thirty Years War, Peter H. Wilson

Thirty Years War, Death Toll, High Estimate8000000.000000

Thirty Years War, Events

Standing

Concerns Death Toll, High Estimate

Currently States 8000000.000000

The higher end of the same range, consistent with estimates that close to a quarter of the population of the German lands died as a result of the war, overwhelmingly to disease and starvation following the collapse of civil order rather than to battle itself.

Source Europe's Tragedy: A History of the Thirty Years War, Peter H. Wilson

Tulip Mania, DescriptionA period in the Dutch Republic, peaking in the winter of 1636 to 1637, during which contract prices for tulip bulbs, especially rare virus-streaked broken varieties, rose to extraordinary levels before collapsing in February 1637. Traditionally presented as history's first recorded speculative bubble and a byword for irrational market mania, it sits inside the Dutch Golden Age, the same decades of commercial wealth, colonial trade and civic pride that produced the Dutch Republic's rise as a maritime and financial power. The scale of the traditional account is itself a live dispute among economic historians: Peter Garber and others working from surviving notarial and contract records argue the episode was a much smaller, largely futures-market phenomenon among specialist growers and traders rather than an economy-wide mania, a revisionist reading that has not displaced the traditional account in general reference works.

Tulip Mania, Events

Standing

Concerns Description

Currently States A period in the Dutch Republic, peaking in the winter of 1636 to 1637, during which contract prices for tulip bulbs, especially rare virus-streaked broken varieties, rose to extraordinary levels before collapsing in February 1637. Traditionally presented as history's first recorded speculative bubble and a byword for irrational market mania, it sits inside the Dutch Golden Age, the same decades of commercial wealth, colonial trade and civic pride that produced the Dutch Republic's rise as a maritime and financial power. The scale of the traditional account is itself a live dispute among economic historians: Peter Garber and others working from surviving notarial and contract records argue the episode was a much smaller, largely futures-market phenomenon among specialist growers and traders rather than an economy-wide mania, a revisionist reading that has not displaced the traditional account in general reference works.

The traditional irrational-mania account is the one repeated in most general reference works; the Garber revisionist reading, based on surviving notarial and contract records, holds the episode was far narrower in scope. Both readings are live in the secondary literature.

Source Tulip Mania (Encyclopaedia Britannica)

Vlad the Impaler, Birth Year1431

Vlad the Impaler, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns Birth Year

Currently States 1431

Wikipedia's infobox gives his birth as between 1428 and 1431, no single year settled; this uses the latest year in that range.

Source Vlad the Impaler (Wikipedia)

Vlad the Impaler, Death Year1476

Vlad the Impaler, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns Death Year

Currently States 1476

Wikipedia's infobox gives his death as December 1476 or January 1477; this uses the earlier month's year.

Source Vlad the Impaler (Wikipedia)

War of the Third Coalition, Death Toll, Low Estimate62050.000000

War of the Third Coalition, Events

Standing

Concerns Death Toll, Low Estimate

Currently States 62050.000000

French and allied forces' own killed, wounded or captured across the 1805-1806 campaign, per the aggregate casualty figures on record for this conflict. This is the SMALLER of two reasonable readings of the war's toll; see death-toll-max for the combined-both-sides figure.

Source Wikipedia: War of the Third Coalition

War of the Third Coalition, Death Toll, High Estimate222050.000000

War of the Third Coalition, Events

Standing

Concerns Death Toll, High Estimate

Currently States 222050.000000

Combined killed, wounded or captured across BOTH sides (allied forces 160,000 plus French and allied forces 62,050), the larger of two reasonable readings; see death-toll-min for the French/allied-only figure. The two numbers answer different questions (one side vs. both) rather than representing a genuine high/low disagreement about the same quantity.

Source Wikipedia: War of the Third Coalition